We are doing a Best Review of the Week contest over the next 8 weeks and we need you to help us select that review.
Nominations will be open for a week and voting will remain open an additional week. The reviews should have been posted within the week period indicated in the subject line. The review should be one that is helpful to reviewers. It should not be based on the scores but on the details. If you nominate a review, please tell why it was helpful and include a link to the review. We will reward VIP days for the Top 3 reviews, as voted on by members, using the ‘like’ feature, each week.1st place - 60 days
2nd place - 45 days
3rd place - 30 days The provider who is reviewed, will also get the same number of days, provided she has an account and is linked to her reviews. The poster nominating the review will get 30 days. You can post your nomination underneath this post. If you find the review helpful, please be sure to click on ‘like’. Winners will be determined by how many ‘likes’ the review receives.
So are we allowed to nominate our own reviews?
I nominate fatdsinck83 review of Marlow. The review was very descriptive and almost read like a XXX paperback! If you had any doubts about seeing Marlow, this revview will change your mind!
https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/marlow-review-by-fatdsinck83-2231325
If you think your review is the best submitted within the time frame, then yes.
But, you need to tell why yours is better.I nominate DCGuy1980. His review of Rubi was spot on, descriptive, honest rating and saved me and other members $$$ and from going to a disappointing session; what TER is all about. While great reviews are helpful and sometimes fun to read, the opposite is MORE important; avoiding duds.
There is nothing lost going to a great provider with great service. Time and money wasted is the opposite. Walking into a situation where the provider sucks and you wasted your time on an ugly poor service provider. See link to review.
The review put up by LTM&L was nothing more than a shill for his P&R buddy Zack, the review itself told us NOTHING new and quite frankly was a waste of the fifteen seconds it took me to read it, although I will allow that Dani is by far the best looking girl in an otherwise rather mediocre line up put out by 100 Proof, that said the review tells me nothing new and was a complete waste of my time.
The review of Marlow also added nothing useful to someone like me, except to let me know that apparently going bareback DOES increase the appearance score of a woman who otherwise should be getting sixes at most for her looks.
DC guy OTOH will hopefully save several guys some money, his review has the ring of truth to it and after reading it there is no way I would risk a penny with this agency, and isn't that why TER was created in the first place. Like I said earlier, we are still in the early going, and I have no idea if there might be some better reviews nominated as the week moves on, but so far at least the review by DCGuy is the only one worth a "like" IMHO, and a "like" from me it will receive.
I vote for Theocrat’s review of NataliaSky. I am in awe of all of his detailed and quite poetic reviews. This one is a literary masterpiece!! A+++
Cheers Mate!
That was a good read; maybe a little long but that's alright.
I think a lot of guys are looking for non-FS providers in the covid era, and this was a good one with a lot of details and color:
https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/nadia-review-by-junior318-2233382So you can pretty much add any of Marlow's reviews as they are all amazing and she is great but sexyAF review is pretty novelesk.
The Best Review was from dcguy1980 for his review of Rubie.
Second Best was by the review of Natalia Skye by Theocrat. The third place goes to junior318 for his review of Nadia. Days have been added to the above users' accounts, as well as to the members who nominated the reviews and to the providers (if they were linked to their TER ID).Even more impressive is that she fucked another guy right after that, damn....lmao